EB-1 India versus EB-2 India
EB-1 India and EB-2 India share a 7% per-country annual cap, but EB-1 sees substantially less demand from Indian-born petitioners than EB-2. The result is a much shorter EB-1 backlog — typically a few years for EB-1 India versus over a decade for EB-2 India.
Filing EB-1A with credible evidence is therefore strictly better than EB-2 NIW for India-born petitioners — when the underlying record can support it.
What 'credible' EB-1A evidence looks like for India-born candidates
USCIS evaluates EB-1A under the Kazarian two-step framework: at least three of ten regulatory criteria, then a final-merits determination. India-born STEM petitioners commonly satisfy original contributions, peer review, scholarly authorship, and critical-role criteria.
Indian academic credentials should be evaluated by a credible credential-evaluation service. Publications in Indian journals are accepted; what matters is independent citation impact and downstream adoption, not the journal's geographic location.
Filing both EB-1A and EB-2 NIW in parallel
Many India-born petitioners file EB-1A and EB-2 NIW concurrently as independent I-140 petitions. The EB-2 NIW filing locks in a backup priority date in case EB-1A is denied; if EB-1A is approved, the EB-2 priority date can still be used and ported to a future EB-2 filing.
Both petitions can be premium-processed (15 business days for EB-1A, 45 calendar days for EB-2 NIW), accelerating the strategy assessment.